<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Higher-dimensional order theory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://math.breckes.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://math.breckes.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 05:43:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The two meanings of the word “set” in mathematics by Toby Bartels</title>
		<link>http://math.breckes.org/2009/03/the-two-meanings-of-the-word-%e2%80%9cset%e2%80%9d-in-mathematics/comment-page-1/#comment-2633</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby Bartels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 05:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://math.breckes.org/?p=9#comment-2633</guid>
		<description>Maybe you&#039;re not here anymore (see the spam above), but I have a comment anyway.

When you write
&gt;two sets¹ are considered to be “the same” if there exists a bijection between them
notice that it&#039;s not just a matter of *whether* the two sets¹ are the same (whose answer is a truth value) but fo *how* the two sets¹ are the same (whose answer is a set¹, the set¹ of bijections between them).

Other than that, you are (of course) absolutely correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you&#8217;re not here anymore (see the spam above), but I have a comment anyway.</p>
<p>When you write<br />
&gt;two sets¹ are considered to be “the same” if there exists a bijection between them<br />
notice that it&#8217;s not just a matter of *whether* the two sets¹ are the same (whose answer is a truth value) but fo *how* the two sets¹ are the same (whose answer is a set¹, the set¹ of bijections between them).</p>
<p>Other than that, you are (of course) absolutely correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
